Transcript
13:33
Uh the post says the Navy in particular is feeling taxed and overextended due to long deployments for the force and then wear and tear on naval assets. We’ve talked about that in the context of the USS Abraham Lincoln. Um but
I talked to a bunch of people who um worked at top jobs at the Pentagon about this post story and most of them said basically the same thing which is like it’s not unsurprising or all that rare to have um combatant commanders non-concur on an order. Non-concur means I don’t like it but I’ll do it. Um, it’s like, you know, you’re with your spouse, you’re like, “Fine, we can get Tai, but I’m not happy about it.” Passive aggressive. I do like Tai. I do that all I get a lot of Tai.
QUESTIONS:
Have you or others you know ever done the equivalent of a “Non-Concur?”
Does Congress pay attention to the Non-Commits in the military?
Is there the equivalent of this concept in other parts of government?
ELSEWHERE:
Reddit: Experience with non-concur?